Harmonizing Habits and Self-Determination: When Personalism Meets Dynamic Capabilities
Abstract
After decades of advancements, research on capabilities dynamization has come to two antagonistic positions. The first one understands dynamic capabilities as higher-order collective routines (e.g., R&D, product development, post-merger integration), premised on a central role of individual habits. It is criticized by those scholars who see learned, semi-automatic routines as insufficient to engender the radical regeneration in organizational capabilities required in dynamic environments (e.g.,Schreyögg & Kliesch-Eberl, 2007; Teece, 2007). The second position understands capabilities dynamization as the outcome of rapid learning and the tailored and logically-structured solutions advanced by organizational leaders (e.g., ad-hoc problem solving, improvisation, single and cognitively sophisticated solutions). It is premised on a central role of managerial autonomy and self-determination. This position is criticized for doing away with the proven routine-based selection patterns and operating rules that allow organizations to both observe and handle environmental developments (e.g., Helfat et al., 2007; Winter, 2003). We claim that this conundrum results from somehow incomplete “models of humans” espoused by each position. In this conceptual paper we propose a new model, based on Personalism, which provides the foundations for parsimoniously integrating the two opposite positions by harmoniously integrating habits and self-determination. We describe the basic elements of capabilities dynamization premised on this alternative “model of humans” and call for a Person-centric view of strategy and organizations (Ghoshal, 2005; Ghoshal, Bartlett & Moran, 1999). BIO |
Download paper |
Contact information: |
Vanessa Strike |