Publications


Article/Letter to the editor

Part of book - chapter

  • Dijke, M.H. van & Cremer, D. De (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer.
  • De Cremer, D. & Dijke, M.H. van (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Cremer, D., Dijk, E. van & Reinders Folmer, C.P. (2009). Why leaders may feel entitled to take more: Feelings of entitlement as a moral rationalization strategy. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 107-120). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  • De Cremer, D., Kleef, G. van & Wubben, M.J.J. (2007). Do the emotions of others shape justice effects? An interpersonal approach. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 35-57). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
2020
M.H. van Dijke (2020). Employee motivation in times of organisational hardship. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 38, 22-24.
J. Brockner, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, B. Holz, L. De Schutter & A. Van Hiel (2020). Factors Affecting Supervisors’ Enactment of Interpersonal Fairness: The Interactive Relationship between Their Managers’ Informational Fairness and Supervisors’ Sense of Power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. doi: 10.1002/job.2466
M.H. van Dijke (2020). Power and leadership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.012
M.H. van Dijke, N. van Quaquebeke & J. Brockner (2020). In self-defense: Reappraisal buffers the negative impact of low procedural fairness on performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied. doi: 10.1037/xap0000303
L.M. Giurge, M.H. van Dijke, X. Zheng & D. De Cremer (2020). Does Power Corrupt the Mind? The Influence of Power on Moral Reasoning and Self-Interested Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003
L. Sheppard, J. O'Reilly, M.H. van Dijke, S. Restubog & K. Aquino (2020). The Stress-Relieving Benefits of Positively-Experienced Social Sexual Behavior in the Workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 38-56. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.002
G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer & A. Van Hiel (2020). Cognitive Foundations of Impartial Punitive Decision Making in Organizations: Attribution and Abstraction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. doi: 10.1002/job.2480
X. Zheng, Y. Yuan, M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer & A. Van Hiel (2020). The Interactive Effect of a Leader’s Sense of Uniqueness and Sense of Belongingness on Followers’ Perceptions of Leader Authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 515-533. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-4070-4
2019
M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, T. Wildschut & C. Sedikides (2019). Nostalgia Promotes Intrinsic Motivation and Effort in the Presence of Low Interactional Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 46-61. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.003
G. Dominioni, P.T.M. Desmet & L.T. Visscher (2019). Judges Versus Jurors: Biased Attributions in the Courtroom. Cornell International Law Journal, 52, 235-265. [go to publisher's site]
J. Luyten, R. Kessels, P.T.M. Desmet, P. Goos & P. Beutels (2019). Priority-Setting and Personality: Effects of Dispositional Optimism on Preferences for Allocating Healthcare Resources. Social Justice Research, 2019 (February), 186-207. doi: 10.1007/s11211-019-00329-5 [go to publisher's site]
P. Manjunath & M.H. van Dijke (2019). Trickle-down effects of unethical behavior: The role of meaning making. In D. Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.), BAS 360 series on Business Ethics. Bingley, UK: Emerald
C.P. Reinders Folmer, P.T.M. Desmet & W.H. van Boom (2019). Beyond compensation? Examining the role of apologies in the restoration of victims' needs in simulated tort cases. Law and Human Behavior, 43 (4), 329-341. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000335
2018
M.H. van Dijke (2018). The influence of power on prosocial behaviour. RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 33 (1), 5-7.
W.H. van Boom, C.P. Reinders Folmer & P.T.M. Desmet (2018). Vergelijkende rechtscultuur en aansprakelijkheidsrecht – een verkennend experiment. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 39 (1), 14-29. doi: 10.5553/RdW/138064242018039001004
W.H. van Boom, P.T.M. Desmet & P. Mascini (2018). Empirical Legal Research in Action – reflections on methods and their applications. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, M. Schminke, L. De Schutter & J. Stouten (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (12), 1335-1357. doi: 10.1037/apl0000339
M.H. van Dijke, G. van Houwelingen, N. Hoogervorst & L. Versteegt (2018). Reflection and action: A study on moral learning consultation within Dutch prison authorities. In M. Kowalski (Ed.), Ethics of counterterrorism. Amsterdam: Boom
M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, G. Langendijk & C. Anderson (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (2), 164-181. doi: 10.1037/apl0000260
M.H. van Dijke, G. Van Houwelingen, D. De Cremer & L. De Schutter (2018). So gross and yet so far away: Psychological distance moderates the effect of disgust on moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 689-701. doi: 10.1177/1948550617722198
G. Van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2018). Trust maintenance as a function of construal level and attributions: the case of apologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 33-46. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2291
X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J. Narayanan & D. De Cremer (2018). When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: Victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (1), 70-87. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1392940
G.N.G. Vanderveen, V.A.J. Frissen, H.W. Volberda & M.H. van Dijke (2018). International working conference on visualizations & law – Small grant of the Erasmus Initiative Dynamics of Inclusive Prosperity.
2017
L.B. Gobena & M.H. van Dijke (2017). Fear and caring: Procedural justice, trust, and collective identification as antecedents of voluntary tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62 (October), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005
G.G. van Houwelingen, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2017). Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness. The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance. Journal of Management, 43 (2), 319-347. doi: 10.1177/0149206314530166
J.W. Metz, L. Roza, L.C.P.M. Meijs, N. Hoogervorst & E.A. van Baren (2017). Differences between paid and unpaid social services for beneficiaries. European Journal of Social Work, 20 (2), 153-166. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1188772
P.T.M. Desmet (2017, december 1). Compensation is Fine: The Willingness to pay Compensation vs. fines. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Workshop 'Experiments at the Crossroads of Law and Economics.
P.T.M. Desmet (2017, december 19). Economische motieven in emotionele termen, het blijft riskant. NRC.nl
P.T.M. Desmet (2017, oktober 17). Column 'Doorbreek de armoedecyclus met wetenschap'. NRC.nl
L.B. Gobena (2017, december 15). Towards Integrating Antecedents of Voluntary Tax Compliance. EUR Prom./coprom.: prof.dr. M.H. van Dijke & P. Verboon.
2016
X. Zheng, M.H. van Dijke, J.M. Leunissen, L.M. Giurge & D. De Cremer (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69 (6), 1387-1418. doi: 10.1177/0018726715611236
2015
E. Bianchi, J. Brockner, K. van den Bos, M. Seifert, H. Moon, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome favorability and procedural fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (1), 19-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167214556237
W.H. van Boom, P.T.M. Desmet & M.R. Van Dam (2015). Eenvoudige tekst, eenvoudige claim? Over de invloed van tekstniveau in algemene verzekeringsvoorwaarden op verwachtingen en gedrag van consumenten. Tijdschrift voor consumentenrecht & handelspraktijken, 2015 (4), 200-207.
P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior of ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (6), 1034-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.004
P.T.M. Desmet, W.H. van Boom & C.P. Reinders Folmer (2015). Privaatrecht in het laboratorium: verslag van acht rechtspsychologische experimenten (Jonge Meesters). Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers
M.H. van Dijke, T. Wildschut, J.M. Leunissen & C. Sedikides (2015). Nostalgia Buffers the Negative Impact of Low Procedural Justice on Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127 (March), 15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005
A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2015). Out of control!? How loss of self-control influences prosocial behavior: the role of power and moral values. PLoS One (online), 10 (5), 1-20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126377
M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, L.G.G. Brebels & N. van Quaquebeke (2015). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, 41 (7), 1982-2003. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478187
S. van Gils, N. van Quaquebeke, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.08.005
2014
E.A. van Baren, L.C.P.M. Meijs, L. Roza, J.W. Metz & N. Hoogervorst (2014). On contemporary volunteering and volunteer management as building blocks for the pedagogic civil society. In L. Bridges Karr, L.C.P.M Meijs & J. Metz (Eds.), Volunteering and Youth Services. Essential readings for social work, social policy and urban management (pp. 33-52). Amsterdam: SWP
D. De Cremer, G.G. van Houwelingen, I. Cornelis, N. Hoogervorst, L.G.G. Brebels, M.H. van Dijke & A. Van Hiel (2014). Are leaders fair? On the need to understand fairness management in organizations. European Business Review, July-Augus, 6-8.
P.T.M. Desmet (2014). Behavioral Equity. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 170 (1), 165-167.
M.H. van Dijke, S.R. Giessner, R. Van Tulder & R.I. Gilbert (2014). What value ethical leadership? RSM Discovery - Management Knowledge, 18 (2), 8-11.
N. Hoogervorst (2014). Procedural fairness and the power of giving voice to employees. RSM Insight, 17 (1), 20-22.
N. Hoogervorst, E.A. van Baren, J.W. Metz, L. Roza & L.C.P.M. Meijs (2014). Propositions concerning the use of volunteers to provide support to children and their parents. In L. Bridges Karr, L.C.P.M Meijs & J. Metz (Eds.), Volunteering and Youth Services. Essential readings for social work, social policy and urban management (pp. 91-105). Amsterdam: SWP
J.W. Metz, N. Hoogervorst, L.C.P.M. Meijs, E.A. van Baren & L. Roza (2014). The pedagogic value of volunteering in child and youth development. In L. Bridges Karr, L.C.P.M Meijs & J. Metz (Eds.), Volunteering and Youth Services. Essential readings for social work, social policy and urban management (pp. 107-118). Amsterdam: SWP
P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition Influences Leader's Disciplining Behavior. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014 (1):15818. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.119
M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2014). Justice in the work setting. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer
A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Being `in Control' May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121 (1), 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2
A. Joosten, M.H. van Dijke, A. Van Hiel & D. De Cremer (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123 (1), 71-83. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1794-z
J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & C.P. Reinders Folmer (2014). Forecasting Errors in the Averseness of an Apology. Social Justice Research, 27 (3), 322-339. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0216-4
J. Luyten, P.T.M. Desmet, V. Dorgali, N. Hens & P. Beutels (2014). Kicking against the pricks: vaccine sceptics have a different social orientation. European Journal of Public Health, 24 (2), 310-314. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt080
P.T.M. Desmet, N. Hoogervorst & M.H. van Dijke (2014). Prophets vs. Profits: How Market Competition influences Leaders’ Disciplining Behavior. Best OB Paper Award for Outstanding Practical Implications for Management: . Populariserende publicatie.
M.H. van Dijke (2014). Understanding immoral conduct in business settings. A behavioural ethics approach. (2014, december 19). Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management
2013
M.H. van Dijke (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13 (1), 16-17.
J.W. Metz, N. Hoogervorst, L.C.P.M. Meijs, E.A. van Baren & L. Roza (2013). Unique value of volunteering for the upbringing of children. In G. von Schnurbein, D. Wiederkehr & H. Ammann (Eds.), Freiwilligenarbeit zwischen freiheit und professionalisierung (pp. 239-252). Zürich: Seismo Verlag
F.M. Cramwinckel, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115 (1), 93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1385-4
J.M. Leunissen, D. De Cremer, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (3), 315-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005
J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke, D. Mayer, D. De Cremer & M. Euwema (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (5), 680-695. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.002
2012
D. De Cremer, J.M. Leunissen, C.P. Reinders Folmer & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23 (3), 76-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8616.2012.00882.x
N. Hoogervorst (2012). The psychology of ethical leaders. RSM Insight, 9 (1), 21-22.
J.W. Metz, L.C.P.M. Meijs, L. Roza, E.A. van Baren & N. Hoogervorst (2012). Grenzen aan de Civil Society. In H. Jumelet & J. Wenink (Eds.), Zorg voor onszelf? Eigen kracht van jeugdigen, opvoeders en omgeving, grenzen en mogelijkheden voor beleid en praktijk (pp. 117-130). Den Haag: SWP
J.W. Metz, L.C.P.M. Meijs, L. Roza, E.A. van Baren & N. Hoogervorst (2012). Rol Civil Society in transitie jeugdzorg? Tijdschrift Jeugdbeleid, 6 (2), 71-79.
J.V.R. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44.
D. De Cremer, N. Hoogervorst & P.T.M. Desmet (2012). Procedural Justice and Sanctions in Social Dilemmas: The Moderating Effects of Group Feedback and Identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42 (7), 1675-1693. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00914.x
D. De Cremer & P.T.M. Desmet (2012). How victims' motives influence the effect of apologies: A motivated trust repair model. In R. Kramer (Ed.), Restoring Trust: Challenges and Prospects (pp. 241-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press
D. De Cremer & P.T.M. Desmet (2012). Restoring trust depends on the victim's motives: A motivated trust repair model. In R. Kramer & T. Pittinsky (Eds.), Restoring trust: Challenges and prospects (pp. 241-256). New York: Oxford University Press.
P.T.M. Desmet (2012). Wanneer verontschuldigingen doel treffen: inzichten uit de psychologie. In W. van Boom & I. Giesen (Eds.), Civilologie: opstellen over empirie en privaatrecht (pp. 183-196). Boom Juridische Uitgevers
P.T.M. Desmet (2012). De psychologie van financiële compensaties: Maakt geld alles goed? In T. Barkhuysen, W. Den Ouden & M.K.G. Tjepkema (Eds.), Coulant compenseren? Over overheidsaansprakelijkheid en rechtspolitiek (pp. 583-596). Deventer: Kluwer
B. Geenen, K. Proost, B. Schreurs, M.H. van Dijke, E. Derous, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17 (1), 67-82. doi: 10.1108/13620431211201337
B. Geenen, K. Proost, M.H. van Dijke, K. De Witte & J. von Grumbkow (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20 (4), 404-413. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12003
N. Hoogervorst, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), 883-896. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006
D.M. Mayer, S. Thau, K.S. Workman, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (1), 24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.003
K. Proost, J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. van Dijke (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21 (1), 7-27. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304
J. Stouten, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11 (1), 1-6. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000059
M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer & N. van Quaquebeke (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (2), 235-248. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006
P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.15
M.J.J. Wubben, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2012). Is Pride Prosocial? Interpersonal Effects of Authentic and Hubristic Pride. Cognition & Emotion, 26 (6), 1084-1097. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.646956
2011
L.G.G. Brebels, D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. van Hiel (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22 (SI), S47-S58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00715.x
P.T.M. Desmet, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2011). In money we trust? The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114 (2), 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006
P.T.M. Desmet, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2011). Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (3), 267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.027
J. Van Ruysseveldt & M.H. Van Dijke (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (2), 470-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.003
P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (1), 120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
M.J.J. Wubben, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2011). The communication of anger and disappointment helps to establish cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (3), 489-501. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.016
P.T.M. Desmet (2011, mei 10). In money we trust? Trust repair and the psychology of financial compensations. Erasmus University Rotterdam (162 pag.) (Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (PhD Serie 232)) Prom./coprom.: prof.dr. D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk.
N. Hoogervorst (2011, september 23). On The Psychology of Displaying Ethical Leadership: A Behavioral Ethics Approach. Erasmus University Rotterdam (180 pag.) (Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (PhD Serie 244)) Prom./coprom.: prof.dr. D. De Cremer & Marius Van Dijke.
N. Hoogervorst (2011, september 22). Ethisch leider hoeft niet aardig te zijn. Trouw, pp. 15.
2010
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & D.M. Mayer (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (6), 1121-1133. doi: 10.1037/a0020419
D. De Cremer, J. Brockner, A. Fishman, M.H. Van Dijke, W. van Olffen & D.M. Mayer (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (2), 291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866
D. De Cremer, A. Tenbrunsel & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0789-x
P.T.M. Desmet, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2010). On the Psychology of Financial Compensations to Restore Fairness Transgressions: When Intentions Determine Value. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0791-3
M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (1), 85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004
M.H. van Dijke & P. Verboon (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (1), 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.005
P. de Heus, N. Hoogervorst & E. van Dijk (2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner's dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (5), 736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013
N. Hoogervoorst, D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (supplement 1), 29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1
M.H. Van Dijke, D. De Cremer & D. Mayer (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (3), 488-502. doi: 10.1037/a0018921
M.J.J. Wubben (2010, februari 5). Social functions of emotions in social dilemmas. Erasmus University Rotterdam (166 pag.) (Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (PhD Serie 187)) Prom./coprom.: prof.dr. D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk.
2009
K. Könings & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Groningnen: Noordhoff Publishers
K. Proost & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Werving van personeel. In M..H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren. Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
M.H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers
M.H. van Dijke & K. Proost (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Groningen, The Netherlands:: Noordhoff Publishers.
D. De Cremer, D.M. Mayer, M.H. van Dijke, B.C. Schouten & M. Bardes (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 887-899. doi: 10.1037/a0014782
D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65 (4), 114-117. doi: 10.1007/BF03080133
D. De Cremer & M.H. van Dijke (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
M.H. van Dijke, D. De Cremer, P. Schefferlie & A.E.R. Bos (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18 (1), 8-28. doi: 10.1080/13594320701856699
G. Langendijk, M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126. doi: 10.1007/BF03080134
M.J.J. Wubben, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2009). When and how communicated guilt affects contributions in public good dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (1), 15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.015
M.J.J. Wubben, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2009). How emotion communication guides reciprocity: establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 987-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.010
2008
D. De Cremer, M.J.J. Wubben & L.G.G. Brebels (2008). When unfair treatment leads to anger: The effects of interpersonal emotions and ambiguous unfair procedures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (10), 2518-2549. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00402.x
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke, L.G.G. Brebels & N. Hoogervorst (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175. doi: 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-157
M.H. van Dijke & D. De Cremer (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17 (2), 226-250. doi: 10.1080/13594320701743491
J.W. Van Prooijen, D. De Cremer, I. Van Beest, T. Stahl, M.H. van Dijke & P. Van Lange (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (5), 1303-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006
M.J.J. Wubben & A.J.J.M. Vingerhoets (2008). The health benefits of crying. Emotion Researcher, 23 (1), 15-17.
M.J.J. Wubben, D. De Cremer & E. van Dijk (2008). When emotions of others affect decisions in public good dilemmas: An instrumental view. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (5), 823-835. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.531
2007
K. Zamani & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.
C. Bolman, L. Lechner & M.H. van Dijke (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-42
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 (8), 1797-1816. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x
D. De Cremer, G. van Kleef & M.J.J. Wubben (2007). Do the emotions of others shape justice effects? An interpersonal approach. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 35-57). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing
M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669. doi: 10.1177/1046496407304339
P. Verboon & M.H. van Dijke (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.004
2006
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2006). Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 554-565. doi: 10.1108/01437730610692416
D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233
M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.351
L. Lechner, C. Bolman & M.H. van Dijke (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal011
2004
D. De Cremer, D. van Knippenberg, M.H. van Dijke & A. Bos (2004). How Self-Relevant is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Justice Effects. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419. doi: 10.1007/s11211-004-2059-x
D. De Cremer, M.H. van Dijke & A.E.R. Bos (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25 (5), 466-475. doi: 10.1108/01437730410544773
M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.13
2003
M.H. van Dijke & M. Poppe (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparison in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00524-3
2002
J. Syroit, E. Derous, M. Hommes, H. Lodewijckx, M.H. van Dijke & P. Poelmans (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland
M.H. van Dijke. Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. UvT Prom./coprom.: M. Poppe & J. Rijsman.