M.H. (Marius) van Dijke

Marius van Dijke is Acting Scientific Director of the Erasmus Centre of Behavioral Ethics (ECBE) and associate professor at the Department of Business-Society Management at the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM).

His research is concerned with behavioral ethics and leadership of high integrity. Examples of issues he examines in his research include when power stimulates ethical and unethical behavior, why people so deeply value social justice, and what the role is of intuitive and controlled processes in moral judgment and behavior. These issues have important implications both for theory and practice, supplying tools that stimulate employees and managers to function both productively and ethically.

He has published widely on these topics in Management and Psychology journals, for instance in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Leadership Quarterly, and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

For information about ECBE, click here

• Articles (48)
  • Brebels, L., De Cremer, D. & Van Dijke, M.H. (2013). Using self-definition to predict the influence of procedural justice on organizational, interpersonal, and task-oriented citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, in press.
  • Cramwinckel, F., De Cremer, D. & Van Dijke, Marius (2013). Dirty hands make dirty leaders?! How the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, in press.
  • Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D. & Van Dijke, Marius (2013). When do Leaders Grant Voice? How Leaders’ Perceptions of Followers’ Control and Belongingness Needs Affect the Enactment of Fair Procedures. Human Relations, in press.
  • Joosten, A., Van Dijke, Marius, Van Hiel, A. & De Cremer, D. (2013). Being ‘in Control’ May Make You Lose control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, in press.
  • Leunissen, J.M., De Cremer, D., Reinders Folmer, C.P. & Van Dijke, Marius (2013). The Apology Mismatch: Asymmetries Between Victim's Need for Apologies and Perpetrator's. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 315-324.
  • Van Dijke, Marius, De Cremer, D., Brebels, L. & van Quaquebeke, N. (2013). Willing and Able: Action-State Orientation and the relation between Procedural Justice and Employee Cooperation. Journal of Management, in press.
  • Geenen, B., Proost, K., Schreurs, B., Van Dijke, Marius, Derous, E., De Witte, K. & von Grumbkow, J. (2012). The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations: The moderating role of direct experiences. Career Development International, 17, 67-82.
  • Geenen, B., Proost, K., Van Dijke, Marius, De Witte, K. & von Grumbkow, J. (2012). The role of affect in the relationship between distributive justice expectations and applicants' recommendation and litigation intentions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 404-413.
  • Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, Marius & Mayer, D. M. (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 883-896.
  • Leunissen, J.M., De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, Marius & Reinders Folmer, C.P. (2012). Niet Zo Moeilijk Als Je Denkt: Voorspellingsfouten in het Aanbieden van een Verontschuldiging. In M. Stick, M. Baas, L. van Dillen, R. Dotsch, D. Lakens & M. de Vries (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie. Groningen: ASPO Pers.
  • Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. S., Van Dijke, Marius & De Cremer, D. (2012). Leader Mistreatment, Employee Hostility, and Deviant Behaviors: Integrating Self-Uncertainty and Thwarted Needs Perspectives on Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 24-40.
  • Proost, K., Van Ruysseveldt, J. & Dijke, M.H. van (2012). Using the Job Demands-Resources model to study the relationship between unmet expectations and learning opportunities. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 7-27.
  • Stouten, J., Van Dijke, Marius & De Cremer, D. (2012). Ethical leadership. An overview and future perspecfives. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(1), 1-6.
  • Van Dijke, Marius, De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M. & van Quaquebeke, N. (2012). When Does Procedural Fairness Promote Organizational Citizenship Behavior?: Integrating Empowering Leadership Types in Relational Justice Models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 235-248.
  • Verboon, P. & Van Dijke, Marius (2012). The effect of perceived deterrence on compliance with authorities: The moderating influence of procedural justice. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 151-161.
  • Brebels, L., De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Hiel, A. van (2011). Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment. British Journal of Management, 22(SI), S47-S58.
  • Van Dijke, M.H. & De Cremer, D. (2011). When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 468-479.
  • Van Ruysseveldt, J. & Van Dijke, M.H. (2011). When Are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 470-483.
  • Verboon, P. & Dijke, M.H. van (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120-130.
  • Cremer, D. De, Dijke, M.H. van & Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1121-1133.
  • De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., Van Dijke, M.H., Olffen, W. van & Mayer, D.M. (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 291-304.
  • De Cremer, D., Tenbrunsel, A. & Dijke, M.H. van (2010). Regulating Ethical Failures: Insights from Psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 1-6.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & De Cremer, D. (2010). Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 85-96.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Verboon, P. (2010). Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 80-91.
  • Hoogervoorst, N., De Cremer, D. & Dijke, M.H. van (2010). Why Leaders Not Always Disapprove of Unethical Follower Behavior: It depends on the leader's self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(supplement 1), 29-41.
  • Van Dijke, M.H., De Cremer, D. & Mayer, D. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 488-502.
  • De Cremer, D. & Dijke, M.H. van (2009). On the psychology of justice as a social regulation tool. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 114-117.
  • De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Dijke, M.H. van, Schouten, B. C. & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers¿ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887-899.
  • Dijke, M.H. van, De Cremer, D., Schefferlie, P. & Bos, A.E.R. (2009). Procedural and interpersonal fairness moderate the relationship between outcome fairness and acceptance of merit pay. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 8-28.
  • Langendijk, G., Dijke, M.H. van & De Cremer, D. (2009). Relationships between power and procedural fairness on self-esteem: The mediating role of trust. The Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 118-126.
  • Langendijk, G., Dijke, M.H. van & De Cremer, D. (2009). How power and trust explain procedural fairness effects on self-esteem. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 118-126.
  • De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van, Brebels, L. & Hoogervorst, N. (2008). How intergroup dynamics influence within-group cooperation: The case of prototypical leadership and procedural fairness. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 157-175.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & De Cremer, D. (2008). How leader prototypicality influences followers’ status: The role of procedural fairness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 226-250.
  • Van Prooijen, J. W., De Cremer, D., Van Beest, I., Stahl, T., Dijke, M.H. van & Van Lange, P. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1303-1315.
  • Bolman, C., Lechner, L. & Dijke, M.H. van (2007). Question order in the assessment of misperception of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 42.
  • De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Bos, A.E.R. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797-1816.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2007). Motivations underlying power dynamics in hierarchically structured groups. Small Group Research, 38, 643-669.
  • Verboon, P. & Dijke, M.H. van (2007). A self-interest analysis of tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 704-727.
  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijke, Marius & Bos, A.E.R. (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 10, 233-245.
  • De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Bos, A. (2006). Procedural Justice and Organizational Identification: Effects of Affect-Based and Cognition-Based Trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 553-564.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2006). Personal power motives as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
  • Lechner, L., Bolman, C. & Dijke, M.H. van (2006). Factors related to misperception of physical activity in the Netherlands and implications for health promotion programs. Health Promotion International, 21, 104-112.
  • De Cremer, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Bos, A.E.R. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 466-475.
  • De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., Dijke, M.H. van & Bos, A. (2004). Adding further evidence to the self-esteem – fairness treatment relationship: The moderating effect of social self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2004). Social comparison of power: Interpersonal versus intergroup effects. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 13-26.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2003). Preferred changes in power differences: Effects of social comparisons in equal and unequal power relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 149-160.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2001). Voorkeuren voor het veranderen van machtsverschillen: Effecten van posities en afstanden tussen posities. In C. Martijn, D. Stapel, C. Rutte & E. van Dijk (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie.
  • Dijke, M.H. van & Poppe, M. (2000). Voorkeur voor het veranderen van machtsverschillen in hiërarchisch georganiseerde groepen. In C. Martijn, D. Stapel, C. Rutte & E. Dijk (Eds.), Fundamentele sociale psychologie.

• Books
  • Syroit, J., Derous, E., Hommes, M., Lodewijckx, H., Dijke, M.H. van & Poelmans, P. (2002). Interventies in groepen: conflicthantering en mediation. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

• Book contributions
  • De Cremer, D. & Dijke, M.H. van (2009). Acting fairly to be the boss: Procedural justice as a tool to affirm power relationships with subordinates. In D. Tjosvold & B.M. van Knippenberg-Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 118-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Professional publications (9)
  • Dijke, M.H. van (2013). A broader perspective: Harmonizing leadership activities. RSM Insight, 13, 16-17.
  • Van Ruysseveldt, J. V. R. & Van Dijke, Marius (2012). Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplek leren? Gedrag en Organisatie, 25, 28-44.
  • De Cremer, D., Leunissen, Joost, Reinders Folmer, C.P. & Van Dijke, Marius (2012). Sorry limited. Business Strategy Review, 23(3), 76-77.
  • Proost, K. & Van Dijke, Marius (2009). Werving van personeel. In M..H. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren. Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers.
  • Van Dijke, Marius, Syroit, J. & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (2009). Trends in selectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 263-276). Groningen: Noordhoff Publishers.
  • Van Dijke, Marius & Proost, K. (2009). Voorselectie. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch selecteren (pp. 149-160). Groningen, The Netherlands:: Noordhoff Publishers..
  • Van Dijke, Marius, Syroit, J. & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (Eds.). (2009). Strategisch selecteren. Groningen / Houten: Noordhoff Publishers.
  • Könings, K. & Van Dijke, Marius (2009). Predictoren en criteria. In M. van Dijke, J. Syroit & J. Van Ruysseveldt (Eds.), Strategisch Selecteren (pp. 59-78). Groningnen: Noordhoff Publishers.
  • Zamani, K. & Van Dijke, Marius (2007). Virtueel Laboratorium: Onderzoeken op afstand. De Psycholoog, 42, 379-380.

• Doctoral thesis
  • Dijke, M.H. van. Understanding power dynamics. Effects of social comparison on tendencies to change power and power differences. UvT. Prom./coprom.: M. Poppe & J. Rijsman.