PhD Defence: Emre Karali


In his dissertation ‘Investigating Routines and Dynamic Capabilities for Change and Innovation’, Emre Karali unravels how routines and dynamic capabilities are related to change and innovation within organizations.

Emre Karali defended his dissertation in the Senate Hall at Erasmus University Rotterdam on Friday, May 18 at 13:30. His supervisors were Prof. Henk W. Volberda and Prof. Harry R. Commandeur. His co-supervisor was Dr Jatinder S. Sidhu. Other members of the Doctoral Committee are Dr. Patrick Reinmoeller (RSM), Prof. Hans Berends (VU Amsterdam), Dr. Luciana d’Adderio (University of Strathclyde).

About Emre Karali

Emre Karali was born on the 12th of October, 1991, in Enschede. After finishing his Bachelor’s in Economics and Business and his Master’s in Urban, Port and Transport Economics, he started as a PhD Candidate at the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam. He chose for this trajectory because of his interest in why some organizations are successful whereas others are not. In this regard, his research interests include change, competitive advantange, dynamic capabilities, healthcare management, innovation, organizational design and organizational routines.

Emre’s work has been presented at great amount and variety of conferences, such as the Academy of Management Annual Conferences (Anaheim, 2016; Atlanta, 2017), the Competence-Based Strategic Management Conference (Bochum, 2015), European Academy of Management Conference (Paris, 2016), European Group for Organization Studies (Rotterdam, 2014; Athens, 2015; Naples, 2016; Copenhagen, 2017), the International Symposium on Process Organization Studies (Koš, 2015; Koš, 2017) and the Strategic Management Society Annual Conferences (Denver, 2015; Berlin, 2016).
Aside from generic paper presentations, Emre has been invited to, and has consequently presented at, symposia that were held at the Academy of Management Annual Conferences in Anaheim (2016) and Atlanta (2017).  He has also chaired a variety of the sessions at the conferences he attended, such as at the Strategic Management Society Annual Conference in Denver (2015) and at Academy of Management Annual Conference in Anaheim (2016). Emre has participated in competitive paper development workshops, such as the AMR-OMT Paper Development Workshop in Rotterdam (2016) and the OMT Doctoral Consortium in Anaheim (2016). In addition, Emre has co-hosted an international community at the Rotterdam School of Management, called the ‘Routines.Research.Community’, that researches the dynamics of routines.

Emre has a publication in the journal of Management and Organization Review. Also, Emre has written a book chapter on the role of dynamic capabilities in healthcare innovation, which will be part of a book that is planned to be published this year by a leading publisher. His article in which he researches how organizations as problem-solving entities can solve problems of varying complexities in a variety of ways (Chapter 3 of his dissertation), has been nominated for the best conference paper award at Strategic Management Society Annual Conference in Berlin (2016). All of his articles are either under review at leading academic journals, or are very close to submission.

Currently, aside from his position as PhD Candidate, Emre holds a position as researcher at the Erasmus School of Accounting and Assurance (ESAA), where he continues with his research on the relationship between routines and how organizations function. In addition, he investigates the role of softer aspects, such as love, within organizations and as part of leadership and management. From September onwards, Emre will be an Assistant Professor in Strategy at Özyeğin University in Istanbul, while he will also continue with his position at ESAA.

Thesis Abstract

This dissertation aims to enhance our understanding of why some organizations are successful while others are not. In this regard, in this dissertation, the author unravels how routines and dynamic capabilities are related to change and innovation within organizations. He approaches this question in a conceptual, qualitative and quantitative manner, spread across four studies. The author reviews the literature on routines in relation to change and innovation and performs a bibliometric analysis to assess the level of conversation across two dominant routine-based research streams, being the routine dynamics and dynamic capabilities research streams. Then, he builds a framework of organizational problem-solving, based on these literatures. In his third study, he addresses the question of how the concepts of routines and dynamic capabilities relate to each other, finding that routines are more facilitative and dynamic capabilities more decisive for innovation. Finally, he examines the extent to which routines can contribute to the adaptation of organizations. He finds that individual characteristics, such as professional identity and empathy, can be a source of organizational adaptation and resilience, this way also substituting management.

Photos: Chris Gorzeman / Capital Images